Another one has gotten some
play this year as well, and personally I find it
one of the most interesting things to watch this
year. Simply put, is this Pat Burrell's last year
in left field for the Phillies?
The ultimate tease, Burrell is entering the final year
of his six-year, $50 million deal that went into effect
for 2003. He is slated to make $14 million in 2008.
Burrell's timeline in Philadelphia has been discussed
over and over again. The first overall pick of the 1998
draft had two solid years for the Phillies in 2000 and
2001, then exploded onto the scene the following season
with a 37-homer, 116-RBI campaign that led to his big
deal.
However, in 2003, he batted just .209 and hit 21 homers
and 64 RBI. The following year wasn't much better --
.257, 24 HR, 84 RBI -- but he seemed to turn a corner
in 2005. That season, he hit 32 homers and drove in 117
runs while upping his average to .281.
The damage had already been done by that point, though.
Burrell was billed as a player who couldn't lead this
team to postseason glory, and was undeserving of the
contract he signed. He became a popular whipping boy
and was largely blamed for the team's struggles.
Yet, Burrell never openly complained about it, never
tried to get out of town. Still, given the Phillies
inability to trade him before last season, would that
have really mattered?
In his last two years, Burrell has been good. Not great
and not mediocre, but good. He hasn't hit over .260 in
either year, but 59 homers and 192 RBI are tough to
argue against.
The problem that creates the perception of Burrell is
his knack for going into streaks, both good and bad.
How else could those said numbers be ignored so much.
Last year, Burrell hit just .215 before the break with
11 home runs and 37 RBI. However, as the Phillies
completed an improbable run to the NL East title, "Pat
the Bat" hit .295 with 19 homers and 60 RBI in 74 post
All-Star games.
It was kind of the same in 2006. Burrell's second-half
average was higher, but his home run and RBI total was
better in the first half of the season. Still, it was a
tale of two halves, and lets not forget his inability
to hit with runners in scoring posting in 2006 (.222).
Logic says Burrell will not be back next year. His
salary is best saved for the likes of Howard, Utley,
Hamels and so on. However, let's not forget what
Burrell has done for us.
He hustles to the best of his ability and as much as
his nagging foot will let him. He never looks like he
doesn't try or isn't hustling. And, after all, he
straight-up kills the Mets, which is great.
For what it is worth, Burrell has already said he wants
to stay.
"One hundred percent I want to stay," Burrell told the
Phillies' official Web site in an article published on
February 19. "I'd love to come back. It's really got
more to do with the guys on the team. This group of
guys is going to win for a long time."
If anyone is taking a vote, I vote for Burrell in left
for 2009.
(daily.phanatic.com)